Harmful to the country, undermining SDG 15 and contrary to Indonesia’s commitments under the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) with the European Union.
Jakarta, March 26, 2020 – The coalition of civil organizations engaged in monitoring the implementation of Indonesia’s Timber Legality Assurance System (SVLK) has submitted an open letter to the President of Indonesia, Joko Widodo (Friday, 3/20/2020). This letter demands the immediate revocation or revision of the Ministry of Trade Regulation Number
15 of 2020 (Permendag 15/2020) concerning Export Provisions for Forestry Industry Products, which currently eliminates V-Legal requirements for the export of forest products.
The Ministry of Trade (MoT) has stated that the Regulation (Permendag 15/2020) released on February 27, 2020 is intended to increase the effectiveness of the forest industry and boost Indonesia’s timber exports. Recent government statements have suggested that relaxing V-Legal requirements for timber exports will help to mitigate the impact of the Coronavirus (Covid-19) outbreak on Indonesia’s economy.
These are two illusory, baseless claims. Instead of supporting the forest industry, the enactment of Permendag 15/2020 may well harm Indonesia’s timber exports.
V-Legal certification is one of the key requirements needed to export forest products from Indonesia. The certificate confirms that exported timber products have met timber legality standards, in alignment with government regulations. In the event that the V-Legal certification is not upheld for export requirements, there is a possibility that Indonesia will contravene the commitments it has made in its Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) for Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) with the EU.
The argument that SVLK is not needed to export timber products to the international market is contrary to Indonesia’s commitment to maintain a robust timber legality and traceability system. Claiming that SVLK is not necessary means encouraging exports to markets that are not concerned about the legality of the timber they buy, as well as undermining good forest governance and ignoring the threat of widespread illegal logging.
Tackling illegal logging, establishing a robust forest governance framework, and developing
a comprehensive timber legality assurance system have been a key part of Indonesia’s commitment to implement the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This is particularly relevant to SDG 15: to protect, restore and support the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse landdegradation and halt biodiversity loss. Exporting timber products without legality certification constitutes a violation of SDG 15.
This Permendag will also lead to legal uncertainty. This law can now be interpreted as providing permission for the forest industry to ignore traceability, legality and sustainable development standards.
Ultimately, Permendag 15/2020 will negatively impact Indonesia’s global diplomatic status. Indonesia’s position will be inconsistent with widely agreed global policy. Successful international diplomacy is not only about achieving technical results or economic impact, but also about maintaining strong international standards – such as by consistently trading in products that are free from illegality. On the other hand, competitor countries such as Cameroon, Central African Republic, Ghana, Guinea, Honduras, Liberia, Congo, Vietnam, China, and Myanmar are all preparing their own comprehensive legality systems, which are modelled on Indonesia’s SVLK.
Abu Meridian from Kaoem Telapak stated that enactment of Permendag 15/2020 demonstrates a failed commitment to halt illegal timber trading, which relies on robust SVLK implementation. The system, which has been developed for more than 20 years thanks to the engagement of many parties, is based on core legality, traceability and sustainability principles. The system is applied from upstream wood producers to downstream timber industries and traders, including exporters. SVLK enforcement aims to provide legal certainty for Indonesia’s timber products, both on the domestic and global markets. “Indonesia is well-reputed as a pioneer in timber sector reform, which was previously dominated by illegal practices. This success is recognized by the EU through its timber trade treaty with Indonesia: the FLEGT-VPA”, Abu explained.
M. Kosar from the Independent Forest Monitoring Network (JPIK) said that this Permendag will lead to unrestricted exports of products without any guarantees of legality. “This means a wide-open risk of illegal logging and illegal timber trading. This is a threat that may harm Indonesia’s timber products on the international market, and it will damage our credibility as a pioneer in improving forest governance”, explained Kosar.
Adrianus Eryan from the Indonesian Centre for Environmental Law (ICEL) said that Permendag 15/2020 may decrease interest and incentives for the downstream timber industry to implement SVLK, which will lead to a setback in Indonesian forest governance.
“Business that are committed to sustainable management will be undermined by these
changes and the ensuing legal uncertainty”, Adrianus said.
Syahrul Fitra from Yayasan Auriga Nusantara pointed out that Article 10 of VPA also states that Indonesia must keep enforcing the Timber Legality Assurance System (SVLK) for products that are exported to non-EU countries or sold on the domestic market. “The impact of eliminating V-Legal documentation as an export requirement in Permendag 15/2020 will lead Indonesia to violate the VPA with the EU”, said Syahrul.
The issuance of Permendag 15/2020 was based on limited public participation and ignored the existence of the Independent Forest Monitoring network as a key member of the SVLK framework. The Permendag also fails to take into account the impact of this change on the international credibility of SVLK, which has been built up with great effort in order to eventually win market recognition. “Through our public participation responsibilities, we must oppose the implementation of this regulation, which potentially gives a green light to illegal timber trading and will damage Indonesia’s forests.” concluded Agung Ady, from Forest Watch Indonesia.
Indonesia will risk rejection by international markets if it insists on delivering timber products from unclear sources. The risk of rejection is particularly high from the many countries that have adopted their own regulations to prevent the import of illegal timber onto their markets: the EU, the United States, Australia, Japan, Korea and now China, which is currently revising its Forest Law to include a ban on illegal timber trading.
Should this situation persist until the entry into force of Permendag 15/2020 on May 26 2020, the coalition anticipates a worrying setback for forest governance in Indonesia. The Coalition demands that the President of the Republic of Indonesia immediately revoke or revise Permendag 15/2020. This is in consideration of the fact that the regulation contravenes MOEF Regulation Number 30/2016 and potentially leads to legal uncertainty and disruption to business; that it leads Indonesia to breach its FLEGT-VPA commitment with the EU; that it will undermine trust from business actors who have complied with SVLK standards; and that it will potentially lead to a drop in Indonesia’s timber exports as market trust in Indonesia is lost.
Notes for Editor: